Integroiduista

Integroiduista is a coined term referring to a philosophy and practice that advocates integrated, whole-systems thinking across social, technological, and ethical dimensions. It emphasizes cohesion and interoperability among diverse domains, aiming to reduce fragmentation in policy, design, and research.

Etymology and origins are informal. The word blends a root suggestive of wholeness or integrity with a suffix commonly used to denote adherents of a doctrine. The term appears in contemporary online discussions and speculative philosophy as a label for those who prioritize comprehensive integration, but its exact lineage and accepted definition remain unsettled.

Core tenets of integroiduismo, as used in discussion, include: a holistic approach that crosses disciplines; preference for bridging gaps between sectors such as science, governance, and civil society; emphasis on long-term resilience, equity, and coherence; critique of reductionist or siloed methodologies; and a call for shared goals and metrics that reflect system-wide outcomes. Advocates often stress transdisciplinary collaboration, integrative design, participatory governance, and scenario-based planning.

Practice and methods associated with the term involve cross-disciplinary teams, systems-thinking frameworks, and evaluative metrics that capture interdependencies. It is used to describe efforts in urban planning, public health, education, and technology development that seek unified objectives rather than isolated solutions.

Reception is varied and largely context-dependent. Integroiduista is not widely used as a formal school of thought; rather, it functions as a descriptive label for a family of approaches aligned with holism, systems thinking, and integrative thinking. Critics view it as too vague or overlapping with existing concepts.

See also: holism, systems thinking, transdisciplinarity, integrative thinking, interdisciplinary design.