Home

PartnerTiers

PartnerTiers is a tiered framework used by organizations to categorize partners in a program according to defined criteria. The system is designed to align incentives, streamline resource allocation, and provide differentiated levels of support based on partner performance and commitment.

Typical structure and criteria

PartnerTiers typically includes several levels, such as Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum, though some programs use

Benefits and obligations

Higher tiers generally come with expanded benefits, such as higher margins, deal protection, prioritized technical and

Implementation and governance

PartnerTiers programs are usually managed by a dedicated partner program office or channel management team, supported

Rationale and considerations

The aim of PartnerTiers is to reward performance, scale ecosystem collaboration, and enable efficient partner management

custom
names
or
numeric
scales.
Tiers
are
determined
by
a
combination
of
measurable
metrics,
including
sales
volume
or
revenue,
engagement
and
training
completion,
certification
status,
and
customer
satisfaction.
Eligibility
thresholds
are
defined
for
each
tier
and
are
assessed
over
a
specified
measurement
period,
often
quarterly
or
annually.
Additional
requirements
such
as
co-marketing
commitments,
joint
business
planning,
or
reference-able
customer
wins
may
influence
advancement.
sales
support,
access
to
marketing
funds,
co-branding
opportunities,
and
invitation
to
exclusive
events.
Lower
tiers
provide
baseline
resources,
training,
and
access
to
essential
sales
and
technical
support.
Advancement
between
tiers
typically
requires
meeting
minimum
performance
thresholds
and
adhering
to
program
rules,
with
periodic
reviews
to
confirm
continued
eligibility.
by
an
automated
partner
portal
that
tracks
metrics,
certifications,
and
benefits.
Governance
includes
periodic
threshold
adjustments,
performance
reviews,
and
compliance
checks
to
maintain
program
integrity
and
ensure
alignment
with
corporate
goals.
at
scale.
Some
organizations
compare
tiered
programs
with
flat
or
outcome-based
approaches
to
address
potential
fragmentation
or
gaming
of
metrics.