behoudspolitiek

Behoudspolitiek is a political strategy focused on preserving the existing political order, institutions, and social arrangements by limiting or slowing down substantial changes. The central aim is to maintain stability, predictability, and social peace, especially in times of crisis, uncertainty, or fragile coalitions. The approach emphasizes continuity over abrupt reform.

In practice, behoudspolitiek often manifests as cautious, incremental reforms rather than sweeping changes. It relies on consensus-building, risk aversion, and a preference for preserving core sets of benefits, powers, and rules. Governments or actors employing this approach seek to avoid open confrontations that could jeopardize coalition stability or public calm, prioritizing gradual adjustments that are more likely to be accepted by a broad spectrum of stakeholders.

Context and scope vary, but the term is commonly used in Dutch political science and related debates to describe policy behavior in parliamentary democracies, organizations, or international settings where actors value continuity. It can apply to welfare, fiscal, constitutional, or administrative reforms, and is not tied to a single ideological position; conservative, centrist, or pragmatic actors may employ it depending on the circumstance.

Critics argue that behoudspolitiek can impede necessary modernization, exacerbate inefficiencies, and entrench privileges or unequal power relations by prioritizing stability over reform. Proponents contend that a measured, stable pace of change prevents unintended consequences and maintains social legitimacy. The concept is often discussed alongside alternatives such as reformism, radical change, or experimentation in policy design.