Home

MESIlike

MESIlike is a theoretical or teaching-oriented cache coherence concept that mirrors the ideas of the MESI protocol while introducing variations for discussion or specialized architectures. It is not a formal standard, but it is used in computer architecture literature and coursework to illustrate how coherence can be implemented under different memory hierarchies and messaging schemes, such as bus snooping or directory-based coherence.

Core concepts and states

A typical MESIlike model uses a four-state framework similar to MESI: Modified (M), Exclusive (E), Shared (S),

- M: the cache line is dirty and owned by this cache; it must be written back before

- E: the cache line is clean and only present in this cache; no other cache holds a

- S: the cache line is clean and may be present in other caches; it can be shared.

- I: the cache line is not present in this cache.

In MESIlike, variants may introduce additional transitional states (for example Pending or Forwarded) or modify the

Operation and transitions

- Read miss: a processor requests a line not in its cache. Depending on other caches, the line

- Write miss: issuing a write typically drives the state to M after invalidating other copies as

- Write or invalidate: a cache may invalidate copies in other caches, forcing them to I, while

- Eviction: a dirty line in M generally requires a write-back.

Applications and considerations

MESIlike is used as a conceptual tool to compare coherence strategies, evaluate performance trade-offs, and study

and
Invalid
(I).
Each
state
conveys
ownership
and
durability
of
a
cache
line:
eviction.
dirty
copy.
handling
of
certain
messages
to
reflect
different
interconnects
(bus-based
vs
directory-based)
or
timing
assumptions.
The
core
mechanism
involves
coherence
messages
(read,
write,
invalidate,
data
responses)
that
trigger
state
transitions
and
data
movement
to
maintain
a
consistent
memory
view
across
cores.
may
be
supplied
and
caches
update
to
S
or
E,
with
data
brought
from
memory
or
a
cache
with
a
clean
copy.
required
by
the
protocol
variant.
the
requesting
cache
transitions
to
M
or
(in
some
variants)
E
before
becoming
M.
effects
of
interconnect
topology.
Variants
affect
coherence
traffic,
latency,
and
scalability,
highlighting
differences
between
bus-based
and
directory-based
implementations,
and
between
aggressive
invalidation
versus
shared-copy
coexistence
approaches.