shuralike

Shuralike is a neologism in political science and organizational theory describing processes or structures that resemble a shura, a deliberative assembly historically used in Islamic governance to discuss and decide policy through consensus. The term combines shura with the English suffix -like to indicate similarity rather than origin. In academic usage, shuralike refers to decision-making environments that prioritize broad discussion, inclusive participation, and ongoing seeking of consensus.

Characteristics of shuralike processes typically include open forums for debate, equal opportunities to voice concerns, rotating or non-hierarchical facilitation, and recommendations that are non-binding or advisory in nature. Decisions are often reached through consensus or near-consensus, with deliberate time for argument, revision, and mutual accommodation. Transparency about agendas and record-keeping of deliberations are common features, aiming to build legitimacy through participation.

Applications of the concept appear in studies of deliberative democracy, participatory governance, and some organizational practices such as worker cooperatives, community councils, or tech-community forums that prioritize inclusive discourse. Shuralike approaches may be used to address complex or value-laden issues where rapid, majority-driven decisions could undermine legitimacy or social cohesion.

Critiques of shuralike methods point to potential inefficiency, the risk of deadlock, and the influence of well-organized actors who can shape agendas in ways that limit genuine participation. Supporters argue that they foster legitimacy, trust, and more durable policy outcomes in diverse communities.

See also: Shura, deliberative democracy, participatory governance, consensus decision-making.