biasvariancetradeoff

Bias-variance tradeoff refers to the tension between two sources of error in supervised learning models: bias, errors from flawed assumptions in the learning algorithm, and variance, errors from sensitivity to fluctuations in the training data. As model complexity increases, bias tends to decrease because the model can fit more patterns, but variance tends to increase because the fitted function becomes more sensitive to the particular sample of data. In short, reducing one type of error often raises the other, making it necessary to balance them to minimize overall generalization error.

Bias is the error introduced by approximating a real-world problem with a simplified model. High bias can cause systematic underfitting, where the model misses important relationships. Variance is the variability of model predictions across different training sets. High variance can cause overfitting, where the model captures noise rather than signal.

A common formal view is the bias-variance decomposition of the mean squared error (MSE). For a target variable Y and input X, E[(Y − f_hat(X))^2] = Bias[f_hat(X)]^2 + Var[f_hat(X)] + σ^2, where σ^2 is the irreducible error due to inherent noise. This decomposition helps explain why more complex models reduce bias but increase variance, and vice versa.

Practically, practitioners manage the tradeoff through model selection, regularization, and data considerations. Regularization and simpler models reduce variance; increasing data, feature engineering, and ensemble methods (bagging for variance reduction, boosting for bias reduction) can help. The tradeoff is model- and context-dependent, and its management is central to achieving good generalization.

---