Selgitatavas

Selgitatavas is a term used in Estonian-language scholarly discussions to describe an explanatory mode or approach that emphasizes making reasoning, evidence, and intent explicit in communication. It is often invoked in debates about scientific writing, pedagogy, and informational media, where readers are guided through the steps of reasoning rather than being given conclusions alone.

Etymology and scope: the word derives from the Estonian verb selgitama, meaning to explain, together with a form that signals an explanatory character. In discussions, selgitatavas is used to label a style or method that foregrounds justification, traceable arguments, and transparent criteria for evaluating claims. While not a formal theory, the concept functions as a heuristic for evaluating clarity and responsibility in explanation.

Origins and usage: selgitatavas has appeared sporadically in late 20th- and early 21st-century Estonian educational and rhetorical writing. It is most often employed as a descriptive label rather than as a codified framework, guiding teachers, editors, and researchers toward practices that help audiences follow reasoning, assess evidence, and understand the limitations of conclusions.

Core characteristics: texts described as selgitatavas typically present hypotheses, methods, data, and interpretations with explicit connections among them; they distinguish explanation from assertion; they openly address uncertainties and alternative interpretations; and they tailor the level of detail to the audience’s prior knowledge. In media and pedagogy, a selgitatavas approach aims to improve transparency and trust through explicit justification.

Criticism and limits: the label can be used broadly or vaguely, risking vagueness or pedantry if applied without concrete criteria. Critics caution that excessive emphasis on stepwise explanation may hinder narrative flow or accessibility in some contexts.

See also: explanatory writing, scientific communication, pedagogy.