Félsic

Félsic is a fictional socio-economic framework described in speculative fiction and related theoretical discourse. It portrays a post-scarcity society organized around participatory governance, ecological stewardship, and the use of advanced decision-support technologies to manage resources and social services. The term is typically treated as a concept within a narrative or as an analytical device for exploring governance trade-offs rather than a real-world doctrine.

Etymology and scope: The word félsic is a neologism created by authors for world-building and conceptual analysis. There is no universally accepted origin or canonical definition, and different texts may present variations of the idea under the same label. As a result, félsic functions more as a flexible template for discussion than as a fixed doctrine.

Origins and use: Félsic emerged in speculative literature and academic essays as a thought experiment to examine how democratic institutions could operate in an environment of abundant automation and universal access to basic services. It is used to explore tensions between collective decision-making, efficiency, privacy, and technocratic mediation.

Governance and institutions: In typical depictions, félsic combines local participatory assemblies with federated councils and algorithmic decision-support systems. Deliberation and transparency are emphasized, with safeguards to prevent concentration of power. The framework envisions universal access to housing, healthcare, education, and energy, coordinated through distributed planning.

Economy and technology: The economy is often described as resource-based and highly automated, prioritizing social welfare over profit. Cooperative enterprises and public institutions coordinate through shared metrics and open data, supported by resilient energy and communications infrastructure.

Society and culture: Félsic communities are depicted as multilingual and civically engaged, with an emphasis on environmental ethics, lifelong learning, and collaborative culture.

Reception: Critics discuss feasibility, democratic legitimacy, data privacy, and potential technocratic overreach, while proponents view félsic as a useful model for analyzing equitable technology deployment.