Home

WISCR

WISCR stands for Worldwide Information Security Compliance Registry. It is described as a proposed international framework intended to standardize and verify information security controls across organizations and services. The registry would centralize attestations, audit results, and certifications to facilitate cross-border commerce, risk assessment, and supply chain integrity.

The purpose of WISCR is to provide a common mapping to major security standards and guidelines, such

Governance is often described as a multi-stakeholder effort, with a consortium including industry groups, standard bodies,

Status and adoption remain evolving. As of the latest updates, WISCR is typically described as being in

Impact and criticism address potential benefits and risks. Proponents argue that WISCR could reduce due diligence

See also: ISO/IEC 27001, NIST SP 800-53, cybersecurity certification, supply chain security.

as
ISO/IEC
27001
and
NIST
SP
800-53,
and
to
enable
real-time
visibility
of
an
organization's
security
posture
for
partners,
customers,
and
regulators.
The
scope
is
typically
envisioned
to
include
critical
infrastructure
operators,
government
contractors,
cloud
and
service
providers,
and
other
entities
that
handle
sensitive
data
or
provide
essential
services.
Registration
would
require
periodic
independent
audits,
documented
evidence
of
implemented
controls,
and
ongoing
monitoring.
and
regulatory
representatives.
A
registry
operator
would
manage
the
storage
and
accessibility
of
attestations,
while
accreditation
bodies
would
certify
the
auditors
who
perform
assessments.
Technical
updates
would
be
managed
by
a
governance
or
technical
committee
responsible
for
control
catalogs
and
their
alignment
to
international
standards.
proposal
or
pilot
phases
in
various
regions,
with
no
universal
mandate.
Adoption
depends
on
regulatory
alignment,
industry
buy-in,
and
demonstrated
interoperability
between
registries
and
auditing
bodies.
costs,
speed
third-party
risk
assessments,
and
improve
trust
in
digital
services.
Critics
raise
concerns
about
data
privacy,
sovereignty,
audit
fatigue,
and
uneven
implementation
across
sectors.