Reviewby

Reviewby is a term that does not have a single, formal definition and can refer to more than one concept. In its broad sense, it describes a process in which a work is examined by one or more reviewers, with feedback intended to improve quality before publication or release. The term may be used in discussions about publishing, software development, or digital media workflows, and expectations around attribution and transparency can vary.

In publishing and scholarly contexts, a review-by often relates to who conducted the evaluation. Depending on policy, reviewers may be named or anonymized, and the review comments may be published publicly or kept confidential. The exact handling of reviews, credits, and conflicts of interest differs among journals, publishers, and platforms.

As a hypothetical platform, reviewby could refer to a software or service designed to coordinate structured review workflows. Such a system would typically support submission intake, reviewer assignment, inline annotations, revision tracking, and an audit trail showing changes and approvals. It might integrate with content management systems, accommodate open or closed review models, and provide dashboards for editors, authors, and reviewers to monitor status and quality.

Because there is no single standard associated with the term, interpretations of reviewby vary by industry and organization. When encountering the term, it is best to examine the surrounding context to determine whether it refers to a general process of review, a specific publication practice, or a proposed platform.