Neoprogressives

Neoprogressives is a label used in political commentary to describe a contemporary strand within progressive politics that blends traditional social-justice aims with technocratic governance and an emphasis on evidence-based policy. The term is not tied to a single organization; it describes a loosely connected set of tendencies found in several countries, sometimes across different parties or movements.

Core priorities commonly associated with neoprogressives include climate action paired with advanced industry policies, expansion of universal or expanded healthcare, and education reform focused on lifelong learning. They often foreground digital rights and privacy, anti-corruption measures, open government, and targeted social safety nets. Economic reform tends to emphasize equity and opportunity through regulated markets, investment in green jobs, and measures to curb concentrated power in finance and tech.

Strategic approach typically involves coalition-building with labor groups, environmental organizations, and civic tech communities. Proponents stress evidence-based policymaking, the use of pilots and experiments to validate programs, and governance reforms to improve efficiency and accountability. They may advocate for open data, enhanced civic participation, regulatory modernization, and anti-monopoly enforcement as vehicles for broader social change.

Reception and critique vary by context. Critics argue that neoprogressives can verge on technocratic governance detached from ordinary working-class concerns, risking elitism or policy fatigue. Debates also surface over the pace of reform, immigration, and security issues. The label remains context-dependent and is not universally adopted, reflecting differing national political landscapes and alliances.

See also: progressivism, technocracy, civic tech.