Finalitymoral

Finalitymoral is a neologism in moral philosophy describing the view that some moral judgments or their justifications achieve finality and are not subject to revision in light of further reasoning or new evidence. The term appears in metaethical discussions about the status and authority of moral claims.

Two readings are commonly distinguished. A strong form holds that once a moral claim is properly justified, it is final and cannot be overturned by future argument or empirical finding. A weaker form posits a stable core of final moral commitments that guides further judgment while allowing limited revision elsewhere.

Origin and reception: The term is not a widely adopted standard theory but has appeared in contemporary debates on moral certainty and ethical dogmatism. It is often used to label positions that emphasize closure in moral reasoning, in contrast to ongoing debate and refinement.

Implications and criticisms: Proponents argue that finalitymoral explains moral authority and motivational force. Critics contend it clashes with moral pluralism and with the idea that error, revision, or new evidence can alter moral judgment. Some view it as a rhetorical ideal rather than a robust theory.

Relations to other theories: Finalitymoral intersects with moral realism, deontology, and moral epistemology. It is discussed in relation to moral infallibility, moral closure, and debates about moral progress. See also: moral realism, ethical infallibility, moral epistemology, moral certainty.