parlamentarizmus

Parlamentarizmus refers to a system of democratic governance in which the executive branch derives its legitimacy from and is held accountable to the legislature, or parliament. Unlike presidential systems, where the executive and legislative branches operate independently, parliamentary systems feature a close interdependence between these branches. This structure is commonly found in many European countries, as well as some nations in Asia, Africa, and the Americas.

In a parliamentary system, the head of government—typically a prime minister or chancellor—is usually the leader of the majority party or coalition within the legislature. This individual is responsible for forming a government, appointing cabinet members, and ensuring that legislation aligns with the party’s or coalition’s agenda. The head of state, often a monarch or a ceremonial president, serves primarily as a symbolic figurehead, while the prime minister holds the real executive authority.

A key feature of parlamentarizmus is the concept of *no confidence*, where the legislature can remove the government by voting down a motion of confidence. If this occurs, the prime minister may resign, or the legislature may dissolve and call for new elections. This mechanism ensures that the executive remains responsive to the will of the people as expressed through their representatives.

Parliamentary systems often emphasize collective responsibility, meaning that cabinet members are collectively accountable to the legislature and must support government policies, even if they personally disagree. This fosters unity within the executive branch but can also limit individual ministerial autonomy.

The advantages of parlamentarizmus include greater flexibility in governance, as the executive can quickly adapt to legislative changes, and a stronger connection between the government and the public through regular elections. However, critics argue that coalition governments can lead to instability, as competing parties may struggle to agree on policies. Additionally, the separation of powers is less distinct than in presidential systems, which some view as a potential weakness in terms of checks and balances.