obviousDet

obviousDet is a term that refers to a type of fallacy or logical error where a conclusion is presented as if it logically follows from the premises, but in reality, it is simply a restatement of one of the premises or an assertion that is already assumed to be true. It is sometimes described as an argument that proves what it has already assumed. This type of fallacy is often unintentional, occurring when an individual fails to recognize that their "conclusion" is merely a circular restatement of their starting point.

The core issue with obviousDet lies in its lack of genuine inferential strength. Instead of building a case through evidence and reasoning to reach a new understanding, it circles back to the initial claim. This can make arguments containing obviousDet seem persuasive on a superficial level, as the conclusion appears to be directly supported. However, upon closer examination, no new information or logical progression has occurred.

Identifying obviousDet requires careful analysis of the relationship between the premises and the conclusion of an argument. If the conclusion offers no new insight beyond what is already stated or implied in the premises, it is likely an instance of this fallacy. It is distinct from other fallacies because its error is not in the content of the premises themselves, but in the apparent lack of a meaningful connection between those premises and the stated conclusion.