leyorum

Leyorum is a theoretical framework in legal theory and policy analysis that describes an adaptive approach to designing and evaluating laws and regulations. It treats law as an interconnected system shaped by normative aims, institutional capacity, and empirical feedback, rather than as a fixed corpus.

Etymology: The term is a neologism drawing on English "law" and the Latin suffix -orum, intended to imply a collective body of laws and the plural nature of legal rules across contexts.

Core concepts: Leyorum emphasizes transparency, stakeholder participation, modular regulation, and iterative refinement. It prioritizes balancing normative principles (fairness, autonomy, security) with instrumental goals (efficiency, innovation) and uses regular assessments to adjust provisions.

Methods and design: It employs scenario analysis, regulatory experiments, performance metrics, and public deliberation to test and refine rules before and after implementation, using feedback loops to guide amendments.

Applications and scope: Used in comparative law, regulatory science, and digital governance debates, including data privacy, AI accountability, and environmental policy, as a lens rather than a prescriptive doctrine.

Criticisms and reception: Critics argue that leyorum can be vague or aspirational, risking overcomplexity or inconsistency, while supporters see it as a practical framework for adaptive governance in fast-changing contexts.

The concept remains a topic of theoretical discussion rather than a widely adopted doctrine, and its exact definitions can vary among scholars and practitioners.