lauditing

Lauditing is not a widely established term in professional literature. In contemporary usage, it may refer to two related ideas: (1) the act of praising or publicly recognizing audit findings, processes, or the entities subject to audit; or (2) a misspelling or neologism derived from auditing. Because there is no consensus on its definition, its meaning can vary by context.

As a concept, lauditing would emphasize positive communication around audits. Proponents might use it to highlight transparent reporting, strong internal controls, or effective governance that audits reveal. In this sense, lauditing focuses on the reception and public perception of audit outcomes, rather than the technical procedures of auditing itself. It could appear in corporate communications, annual reports, or governance statements as a way to acknowledge good practices and the value of oversight.

Lauditing also risks overlap with, or confusion with, legitimate auditing activities. If used, it is important to distinguish between the objective evaluation that auditing provides and the evaluative praise or promotional framing that lauditing implies. Without clear standards, lauditing may inadvertently introduce bias, lead to overemphasis on favorable findings, or undermine the credibility of the audit process.

Related terms include auditing, forensic auditing, and lauding (praise). In practice, organizations should maintain independence, transparency, and careful attribution when discussing audit results, regardless of whether the term lauditing is used. The concept remains informal and is not recognized as a standard discipline in formal audit governance.