Home

demLogisk

demLogisk is a theoretical framework that analyzes how logical reasoning interfaces with democratic decision-making. It seeks to formalize the role of evidence, inference, and argument structure in public discourse, while respecting democratic norms such as participation and equality.

The term combines 'dem' from democracy or the people, and 'logisk' from the word logical in Danish/Norwegian,

Its core principles include transparency of reasoning, explicit use of evidence, strategies to mitigate cognitive biases,

Applications include deliberative forums, policy appraisal, design of online platforms for public discourse, and institutional decision

Relation to other fields: intersects argumentation theory, formal logic, political science, and behavioral economics; distinguishes itself

Criticisms: may overstate the feasibility of fully rational deliberation; risks sidelining values, emotions, and cultural differences;

Status and reception: discussed in contemporary philosophy of democracy and online discourse analysis; the concept remains

reflecting
a
Nordic-influenced
approach
to
reasoned
public
debate.
inclusion
of
diverse
viewpoints,
and
accountability
for
the
accuracy
of
claims.
processes
that
aim
to
improve
collective
rationality.
by
integrating
normative
democratic
values
with
systematic
reasoning.
possible
exclusion
of
non-logical
forms
of
knowledge;
practical
challenges
requiring
training
and
moderation.
theoretical
and
is
the
subject
of
ongoing
debate
about
practical
uptake.