circlecommittee

Circlecommittee is a term used to describe a hybrid governance model that combines the distributed, consent-based dynamics of circles with the defined mandate and accountability typical of committees. It is discussed in organizational design and sociocratic literature as a way to handle cross-cutting issues while preserving local autonomy.

Origins and scope: The concept does not refer to a single, standardized practice. In some descriptions, a circle represents a semi-autonomous group with decision-making authority over a domain, while a circlecommittee brings together representatives from related circles to form a cross-functional body with a shared remit.

Structure and process: A circlecommittee typically includes members from participating circles and a rotating facilitator, secretary, and liaison roles. Its mandate covers policy development, resource allocation, or project governance that requires coordination across circles. Decisions are often guided by consent or rounds, with meeting outputs recorded as minutes and action items.

Governance and charter: The existence of a formal charter or policy is common, defining the circlecommittee’s scope, membership rules, term lengths, and escalation paths. Rotating leadership aims to prevent stagnation of power and to promote renewal.

Benefits and challenges: Proponents cite increased cross-functional alignment, community ownership, and flexibility. Critics warn of potential ambiguity in authority, slower decision-making, and the need for clear conflict resolution and governance training.

Usage: Circlecommittee appears in discussions about cooperative organizations, nonprofits, and distributed teams exploring sociocratic-inspired governance. Because the term is not standardized, implementations vary widely.