Scientificadjacent

Scientificadjacent is a neologism used in informal discourse to describe topics, practices, or people that are closely related to science but do not constitute science in the strict sense. It signals proximity to the scientific enterprise while acknowledging boundaries around formal methods, peer-reviewed publication, and epistemic criteria.

Usage and scope. The term commonly appears in science communication, policy discussions, and media to label areas at the periphery of traditional science. This can include science policy, science education, history and philosophy of science, and domains where scientific methods are applied with broader aims, such as data-driven journalism, applied research in industry settings, or technology development that relies on scientific knowledge but operates outside academia.

Examples. Fields often described as scientificadjacent include science communication, science policy analysis, STEM education reform, bioethics, environmental law, and computational social science.

Origins and reception. The phrase is a modern compound formed in online discourse rather than a formal taxonomy. It is not widely used in peer-reviewed literature, and its definition varies by speaker.

Critique. Critics argue that the term can be vague or value-laden, broadening science to loosely defined areas. Proponents say it helps locate focus for interdisciplinary collaboration, policy relevance, and public engagement with science.

Related terms. Related concepts include interdisciplinary work, applied science, science policy, science communication, and history and philosophy of science.