Mediakierre

Mediakierre, also known as media blackout or media boycott, refers to a deliberate and coordinated effort by media organizations to avoid covering or promoting a particular individual, event, organization, or topic. This practice is often employed as a form of protest, political statement, or strategic move to influence public perception or pressure entities to change their behavior.

The term originates from the Finnish phrase *mediakierre*, which translates to "media circle" or "media loop," though in this context, it implies a deliberate exclusion rather than coverage. Mediakierre can be initiated by journalists, news outlets, or media unions in response to perceived ethical violations, censorship, or political repression. It may also be used as a form of solidarity with affected groups or as a form of protest against systemic issues such as corruption, human rights abuses, or media manipulation.

One notable example of mediakierre occurred in Finland in the 1970s and 1980s, when journalists collectively refused to cover certain political figures or events to protest government interference in media operations. More recently, mediakierre has been used in response to controversies involving high-profile individuals, such as politicians or celebrities facing allegations of misconduct. In some cases, it has been employed as a tool to pressure organizations to adopt fair labor practices or ethical standards.

Critics of mediakierre argue that it can lead to an imbalance in public discourse, as certain voices or perspectives are systematically excluded from mainstream media. Supporters, however, contend that it is a necessary tool to hold powerful entities accountable and to protect journalistic integrity. The effectiveness of mediakierre depends on the level of coordination among media outlets and the public’s awareness of the boycott. While it is not a permanent solution, it can serve as a temporary measure to draw attention to important issues and encourage dialogue.