Ickerobotisk

Ickerobotisk is a neologism used in discussions of automation and system design to denote approaches that do not rely on autonomous robotic systems. In practice, ickerobotisk methods may achieve similar goals—such as precision, repeatability, and scalability—through non-robotic means or through human–machine collaborations that keep humans at the center.

Etymology: the word combines icke-, a negation prefix found in Swedish, with robotisk, related to robotics. The term is most common in Swedish-language discourse but has appeared in international discussions about automation ideology and design choices.

Characteristics and examples: ickerobotisk approaches emphasize resilience, transparency, and ease of maintenance. They may rely on lean process optimization, modular non-robotic equipment, and manual tasks enhanced by sensors or software for monitoring rather than autonomous operation. In manufacturing and services, these approaches can involve standardized work instructions, rigorous procedural controls, and human-in-the-loop oversight to manage quality and safety.

Relation to robotics and policy: proponents view ickerobotisk strategies as pragmatic alternatives to heavy robotization, aiming to protect jobs, simplify maintenance, and improve auditability. Critics argue that the term can obscure the benefits of robotics or be used as a political critique of automation trends, potentially limiting consideration of effective robotic solutions.

See also: automation, robotics, human-in-the-loop, non-robotic automation.