Evaluationsanf

Evaluationsanf is a neologism used in evaluation theory to denote the initial phase of a systematic assessment. It emphasizes framing the purpose, identifying stakeholders, articulating expected outcomes, and planning the methods and metrics that will guide later data collection and analysis. The term is mainly found in German-language scholarly literature as shorthand for the pre-evaluation stage.

Its usage varies by discipline, but generally it is conceived as a planning and scoping activity that sits between problem definition and the full evaluation. By distinguishing this early phase, practitioners aim to improve alignment among stakeholders and prevent scope creep during subsequent work.

Core elements typically include scoping the evaluation questions, conducting stakeholder analysis, aligning with a theory of change or program logic, selecting evaluation criteria, identifying risks, and drafting a measurement plan. These components establish a reference framework that subsequent methods can reproduce and justify.

The process yields an evaluation brief or specification that documents aims, key questions, chosen indicators, data sources, proposed methods, timelines, and budget considerations. This artifact serves as a contract between evaluators and sponsors and guides the design of the full evaluation.

Applications span public programs, education, social services, and product or policy initiatives, especially where early clarity improves decision-making or procurement. Evaluationsanf helps organizations compare alternatives, justify investments, and set realistic expectations for what the evaluation can deliver.

Critiques note that the term can be vague and overlap with broader planning activities such as design thinking or project scoping. When overemphasized, it may bias later evaluation questions. Proponents argue that it enhances transparency and alignment across stakeholders. See also: Evaluation, Evaluation design, Logic model, Theory of change.