Drøfting

Drøfting is a term used in Norwegian to describe the process of examining a topic by considering different viewpoints, evidence, and potential consequences. It is commonly employed in academic writing and in school assignments to move beyond description toward critical evaluation. The aim is to present relevant perspectives, assess their strengths and weaknesses, and, if appropriate, offer a justified conclusion or synthesis.

In practice, a drøfting involves framing a problem, outlining several central positions or arguments, and then evaluating them against criteria such as relevance, coherence, and empirical support. It emphasizes critical thinking, transparent use of sources, and logical reasoning. A well-executed drøfting balances competing claims, identifies gaps or uncertainties, and avoids biased or unsubstantiated statements. Where possible it leads to a reasoned stance that is clearly justified in light of the evidence.

Relation to other genres is important: drøfting differs from a polemic or debate, which aims to persuade by arguing a particular side. It also differs from mere analysis, which may describe components without weighing them. In educational contexts, drøfting teaches students to evaluate information, compare alternative explanations, and articulate a well-supported position.

Common practices include defining key terms, presenting multiple perspectives, evaluating sources for reliability, and concluding with a synthesis or precise question for further inquiry.