Continuïteitswet

Continuïteitswet is a term used in Dutch-language policy discourse to denote a proposed legal framework intended to safeguard the continuity of essential functions and enterprise operations during crises or transition periods. The aim is to ensure that critical services—such as energy, water, healthcare, and transport—and key economic activities can continue or rapidly resume after disruptions, while maintaining appropriate governance and accountability.

A Continuïteitswet would typically cover several core elements: requirements for risk assessment and business continuity planning for critical operators; crisis governance arrangements, including designated authorities and decision-making procedures; temporary intervention tools for the state or regulators, such as supervisory measures, support mechanisms, or, where necessary, the appointment of an interim administrator; and coordination with existing emergency and financial stability instruments.

In the Netherlands, the exact statute named Continuïteitswet does not appear to exist as of 2024. The term is used primarily in policy discussions and scholarly debate as a concept to be integrated with existing legal instruments on crisis management, public safety, and corporate rescue. Debates focus on balancing resilience with civil liberties, the proportionality of interventions, and the costs for businesses and taxpayers.

Critics warn that a Continuïteitswet could risk overreach and reduce incentives for private risk management, while supporters argue it would provide a clear, accountable framework to prevent systemic disruption. Advocates emphasize alignment with EU resilience standards and the need for transparent oversight.

See also: crisis management, business continuity planning, essential services, disaster resilience.