Arguare

Arguare is a term used in discussions of argumentation to denote the practice of constructing and evaluating arguments in a structured, transparent manner. The word is not widely standardized and has been described in various ways in pedagogical and online contexts. In its broad sense, arguare involves presenting a position along with a chain of premises, supporting evidence, and clearly articulated reasoning, followed by consideration of counterarguments and rebuttals.

Etymology: The term appears to derive from the Latin arguere, meaning to prove or make clear, with the English infinitive form modeled after Romance-language verb endings. It is used primarily as a coined term within curricula and didactic networks rather than as a formal field.

Forms and usage: Some writers treat arguare as a method of argument construction, akin to argument mapping, where premises are diagrammed and linked to conclusions. Others use arguare to describe a dialogic practice emphasizing openness to counterevidence and iterative refinement of conclusions. In education, arguare may be taught as a component of critical thinking, encouraging students to trace the logical flow from premises to claims and to annotate sources.

Relation to other concepts: Arguare overlaps with argumentation theory, logic, rhetoric, and critical thinking. It shares goals with argument mapping and dialectical approaches but stresses explicit traceability and responsiveness to counterarguments.

Limitations: Given its status as a relatively new or informal term, there is no consensus definition or standardized methodology for arguare. Readers should consult general sources on argumentation and critical thinking for established principles.

See also: Argumentation theory, argument map, dialectics, critical thinking, rhetoric.