rereview

Rereview is the act of evaluating something that has already been reviewed, with the goal of confirming, correcting, or refining its assessment. It may be called a second review, reevaluation, or re-examination.

In academia and publishing, rereview typically occurs when an author submits revisions after reviewer comments; editors may send the revised manuscript to the same or additional reviewers to ensure changes address concerns. In education, instructors may perform rereviews when students resubmit work or when assessments are re-graded after a dispute. In governance and regulatory contexts, agencies may conduct rereview to incorporate new evidence, updated standards, or appeals. Grants and funding processes may also involve rereview during progress checks or renewals.

Process and criteria commonly involve initiating the rereview through an appeal, revision, or new information. Reviewers re-examine material against original criteria and any updated guidelines, focusing on the changes or new data. The outcome can reaffirm, modify, or overturn the prior decision.

Benefits of rereview include improved accuracy, accountability, and fairness, as well as the opportunity to correct errors or adjust to new information. Drawbacks can include longer timelines and greater use of resources, and rereview processes must strive for transparency and independence to avoid repetitive cycles or bias. Related terms include reevaluation, appeal, and audit.