postconcession

Postconcession is a rhetorical and discourse-analytic term describing a pattern in argumentation in which a speaker acknowledges a counterargument after presenting the main claim, often followed by supporting evidence or a justification. The device is distinguished from preconcessions, where the concession is introduced before the main claim, and from simple rebuttal, where opposing points are addressed without a preceding primary assertion.

In practice, postconcession can serve several purposes. It can strengthen credibility by showing openness to opposing views, soften assertive claims, and frame the subsequent justification as a considered response rather than a dismissive rebuttal. The structure typically follows a main claim or argument, then a concession introduced by a concessive phrase such as although, though, or even though, and finally a justification or evidence that supports the claim despite the conceded drawback.

Usage is common in persuasive writing, public speaking, and policy debates, where audiences may benefit from a clear acknowledgment of potential downsides before being presented with supporting data or rationale. Some readers and listeners may perceive postconcession as a balanced or thoughtful approach, while others may view it as an ineffective concession if overused or poorly integrated into the argument.

Example: The policy will yield long-term savings, although it may be expensive. This illustrates a primary claim followed by a concession and then justification or evidence supporting the overall argument.

Related concepts include concession, rebuttal, and refutation, with postconcession forming one pattern among several ways to handle counterarguments in discourse.