neutraalsesse

Neutraalsesse is a term used in contemporary discourse analysis and sociolinguistics to denote the state or practice of achieving neutrality in language and presentation. The concept encompasses linguistic choices, such as neutral diction, balanced framing of facts, and avoidance of rhetorical devices that signal advocacy. Proponents describe neutraalsesse as a methodological ideal in journalism, science communication, and public diplomacy, where the aim is to minimize bias without erasing legitimate perspectives.

The word combines the root related to neutrality (European languages neutraal or neutral) with the suffix -esse, a Latin-derived nominal ending used in some languages to form abstract nouns denoting a state or quality. The coinage is relatively new and does not represent a single standardized definition across languages.

In practice, applying neutraalsesse involves practices such as presenting multiple sides of an issue, disclosing sources and uncertainties, avoiding loaded adjectives, and maintaining consistency across communication channels. Critics warn that true neutrality may be unattainable or even undesirable on contested topics, and that the term should not obscure the responsibility to take ethical positions.

Scholars situate neutraalsesse within debates on objectivity, politeness theory, and media ethics. It is sometimes contrasted with advocacy or agenda-setting, and discussed as a dynamic standard rather than a fixed property of texts.

See also: neutrality, objectivity, balanced reporting, media ethics, scientific communication.