misständ

Misständ is a neologism used in some discussions of discourse analysis and philosophy of language to describe a particular form of stance misalignment in conversation. The term is not widely standardized and does not correspond to a single established phenomenon, but it is employed descriptively to discuss how speakers sometimes adopt positions that conflict with their prior claims, the norms of the discourse, or their own enacted behavior.

Etymology and scope: The word combines a prefix meaning wrong or mistaken (mis-) with elements related to stance or position (from German Stand/Standpunkt). As a coined term, misständ is primarily used in theoretical or analytical writing rather than as a conventional term in empirical research.

Definition and usage: The core idea of misständ is stance misalignment—an inconsistency between what a speaker asserts and what they do, or between expressed positions and the expectations or normative standards of the conversation. Misständ can be accidental (unintentional inconsistency) or strategic (intended to create a rhetorical effect or to test the interlocutor).

Classification: In analyses that employ misständ, researchers may distinguish by scope (local versus global within a discourse), intention (accidental versus strategic), and visibility (overt versus subtle). Some authors also contrast misständ with related notions such as miscommunication or cognitive dissonance.

Relation to other concepts: Misständ intersects with stance-taking, pragmatics, and discourse coherence, and is sometimes discussed in relation to credibility and persuasive impact. It is distinct from Missstand, a German term for a serious problem or malfunction in a system or institution.