konsekvensetikk

Konsekvensetikk is a branch of normative ethics that evaluates the morality of an action based on its outcomes or consequences. This approach contrasts with deontological ethics, which focuses on the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions themselves, regardless of their outcomes. Konsekvensetikk is often associated with the philosophical work of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham, who developed the principle of utilitarianism, a specific form of konsekvensetikk. Utilitarianism holds that the morally right action is the one that maximizes overall happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people.

In konsekvensetikk, the focus is on the results of actions rather than the intentions or motivations behind them. This means that an action can be considered morally right even if it involves performing a morally wrong act, as long as the overall consequences are beneficial. Conversely, an action can be considered morally wrong if it results in significant harm or suffering, even if the intention behind the action was good.

One of the main criticisms of konsekvensetikk is that it can lead to morally questionable outcomes. For example, if a person's actions result in the greatest overall happiness, but involve causing significant harm to a few individuals, some argue that the consequences are not truly beneficial. Additionally, konsekvensetikk can be difficult to apply in practice, as it may be challenging to accurately predict the long-term consequences of an action.

Despite these criticisms, konsekvensetikk remains an important and influential approach in ethical theory. It provides a framework for evaluating the morality of actions based on their outcomes, and offers a valuable perspective on the relationship between actions and their consequences.