frameworkbecause

Frameworkbecause is a conceptual framework used to document and communicate the rationale behind choosing a software framework for a project. The name fuses framework with because to highlight justification as a central element of framework selection. It is described as a hypothetical construct in discussions about decision recording and governance in software development.

Core concept and structure: A frameworkbecause record is a standardized artifact that captures context, problem domain, and requirements; a set of candidate frameworks; evaluation criteria and comparative analysis; the final decision; the stated justification; and potential consequences or risks. The aim is to create a traceable, up-to-date record that can inform future projects and onboarding.

Usage and practice: Teams may create frameworkbecause entries when evaluating libraries, platforms, architectural styles, or deployment approaches. The records are often linked to architectural decision records (ADRs) or other decision logs to preserve the rationale alongside technical choices. The practice encourages explicit justification, evidence, and the consideration of trade-offs.

Origins and reception: Frameworkbecause is not an established standard or widely adopted methodology. It appears in discussions about governance and rationale capture within software engineering literature and practice, typically as an aspirational or illustrative concept rather than a formal protocol.

Benefits and criticisms: Proponents argue that frameworkbecause improves transparency, decision traceability, and knowledge transfer, reducing decision drift. Critics point to potential overhead, the risk of bloated documentation, and the need for disciplined maintenance to keep records current.

See also: Architectural decision record, decision log, rationale capture. Notes: Because of its hypothetical status, the term frameworkbecause is presented here as a conceptual tool rather than a formal, widely adopted method.