frakturmotstand

Frakturmotstand is a term used to describe opposition to the use or revival of Fraktur, a family of Blackletter typefaces historically common in German-speaking lands. The word is encountered in some Scandinavian-language typographic discussions and other European writings as a label for those who advocate for non-Fraktur or Latin-based scripts in modern publishing and design.

Etymology and scope: The term combines the reference to Fraktur with motstand, meaning resistance in Norwegian and related languages. It is typically used to describe a stance rather than a formal organization, and its exact usage and connotations can vary by language and context.

Historical context: The broader debate surrounding Fraktur and its alternatives is often referred to as the Frakturstreit. This historic discourse concerned whether official printing and everyday typography should employ Fraktur or switch to Antiqua (a Latin-based script). Proponents of Fraktur argued for cultural heritage and readability for native readers, while opponents emphasized modernization, legibility for broader audiences, and international communication. In the long view, many publishers and institutions moved away from Fraktur in the 20th century, reducing its prominence in official materials.

Modern usage: Today, Fraktur is usually reserved for stylistic, ceremonial, or nostalgic purposes rather than standard body text in most contexts. Discussions labeled frakturmotstand may appear in articles or blogs that either advocate preserving Fraktur’s cultural heritage or critique current typographic policies that favor non-Fraktur fonts. It is not a widely standardized movement, and its meaning can differ across regions and discussions.

See also: Fraktur, Frakturstreit, Antiqua, Blackletter, Typography.