dogmatismia

Dogmatismia is a term used in philosophy and social critique to describe a disciplined tendency toward dogmatic thinking. It denotes an approach in which a cluster of beliefs is treated as incontrovertible, and questioning or revising those beliefs is discouraged. Etymologically, the coinage blends dogma with the -ia suffix common in scholarly terms to indicate a domain or system of ideas.

Core features include rigid adherence to a claimed authority, suppression of dissent, selective use of evidence, and a preference for rhetoric over method. Proponents may insist that truth is settled by revelation, tradition, or an orthodoxy, while opponents view questioning as loyalty to the truth rather than to a party line.

Origin and usage: The term arose in 21st‑century discourse as a critique of both religious and secular ideologies that rely on unchallengeable claims. It is commonly applied to discussions in politics, education, and media to describe attitudes that resist revision even when new data emerge.

Relation to other concepts: Dogmatismia overlaps with epistemic closure, fundamentalism, and ideological rigidity but is not tied to a single doctrine. It is often contrasted with intellectual humility and open inquiry.

Criticism and limitations: Some critics argue that the label can be imprecise or weaponized, masking legitimate confidence or expertise. Others note that every belief system contains some dogmatic elements, making careful application essential.

Related concepts include epistemic closure, intellectual humility, fundamentalism, and cognitive bias.