deMethodologie

deMethodologie is a term used in academic discussions to denote a critical re-evaluation of conventional methodological assumptions across disciplines. It is not a single, widely adopted theory, but an umbrella idea that surfaces in philosophy of science, social studies of science, and discussions of research design.

Origin and usage: The form combines the prefix de- with methodology, signaling a move away from taken-for-granted methods toward scrutiny of how methods shape knowledge. In practice, proponents emphasize methodological pluralism, reflexivity, and the ethical and social situatedness of research rather than rigid rules.

Core ideas: It involves questioning the universality of standard procedures, foregrounding context, values, and power relations in the design and interpretation of research. It often aligns with anti-positivist or constructivist sensibilities and advocates transparent reporting, iterative refinement, and attention to biases and assumptions.

Applications and debates: The concept informs debates about experimental design, data collection, statistics, and peer review. Critics argue that excessive deconstruction can lead to vagueness or relativism, while supporters contend that it improves rigor by exposing hidden assumptions and promoting adaptable methodologies.

Status: As of now, deMethodologie is not established as a formal program but appears in theoretical discussions and in critiques of traditional methodologies. Its use and meaning vary by field.

Related topics include methodological pluralism, reflexivity, philosophy of science, and science and technology studies.