criteriasuch

Criteriasuch is a term used in philosophy and applied disciplines to refer to a class of criteria that governs the selection, construction, or weighting of other criteria within a decision-making or evaluative framework. As a meta-criterion, criteriasuch operates at a higher level than ordinary criteria, focusing on how criteria themselves are chosen and structured rather than on outcomes directly.

Origin and usage: The term is a neologism that has appeared in academic discussions and online debates about criterion design and evaluation. It is not widely standardized and its precise formulation can vary across contexts, reflecting different disciplinary assumptions about what it means to select and organize evaluative standards.

Key properties: Criteriasuch is context-sensitive, normative in character, and often designed to ensure alignment with overarching goals. It encodes values about what counts as an appropriate, relevant, and non-redundant criterion, and it can function to curb criterion creep by requiring justification for including new criteria.

Applications: In policy analysis, software evaluation, and research methodology, criteriasuch can guide the selection of sub-criteria, influence weighting schemes, and justify decisions about what to measure. It helps make explicit the rationale for including or excluding certain evaluative elements.

Example: In a university admissions rubric, a criteriasuch rule might require that any sub-criterion be demonstrably linked to the stated educational objectives and free from redundancy before it can be used to rank applicants.

Criticism: Because it operates at a meta-level, criteriasuch can be criticized for potential circularity or vagueness if the meta-criterion itself is not anchored in clear objectives. See also meta-criteria, criterion, evaluation, and decision analysis.