Rewizji

Rewizji is a hypothetical framework in the field of collaborative editing and document management that formalizes an iterative revision process emphasizing provenance, transparency, and controlled change propagation. In this conception, a document's history is represented as a network of revisions linked by dependencies rather than a single linear timeline.

Term origin and usage: The term blends ideas of revision and review and appears in theoretical discussions and experimental tools that explore multi-author editing with complete audit trails. It is not a standardized method in mainstream workflows, but functions as a conceptual model for studying revision dynamics.

Key elements include modular changes called atomic revisions, provenance metadata such as author, timestamp, and rationale, review gates, and graph-based merging rules. Proposals are submitted for critique, reviewers assess them, and maintainers merge changes while preserving the history and the context of decisions. Revisions may be rolled back or re-routed if conflicts arise.

Applications and contexts: Rewizji has been proposed for legal drafting, policy documents, academic manuscripts, and complex software documentation where clarity of decision-making and accountability are important. It also informs user-interface designs for collaborative editors seeking to expose revision history as a navigable graph.

Advantages and challenges: Proponents cite improved traceability, safer rollback, and more granular editorial control. Critics point to increased metadata overhead, steeper learning curves, and potential performance costs in large documents or real-time collaboration environments.

See also: revision history, version control, collaborative editing, audit trail.