Recenzenci

Recenzenci is the Polish term for reviewers who evaluate scholarly works. They are typically academics or professionals invited to assess manuscripts, grant proposals, theses, or other scholarly material to help editors, committees, or funding bodies decide on publication, defense, or funding.

Recenzenci examine the work’s originality, significance, theoretical framework, methodology, data quality, analysis, and conclusions. They assess clarity, organization, and sufficiency of references, and provide constructive feedback for improvement. They may also identify ethical concerns such as plagiarism, data manipulation, or conflicts of interest, and check compliance with relevant guidelines.

The process usually involves editors or committees selecting recenzenci based on subject expertise. Reviews are commonly confidential and may be conducted under single-blind or double-blind conditions. Authors may be allowed to submit a response or revised manuscript after receiving feedback. Recenzenci may be asked to declare potential conflicts of interest and to maintain objectivity and impartiality.

Recenzenci are often senior researchers or recognized specialists in their fields, and work on a voluntary or compensated basis depending on the institution or publishing house. They are expected to adhere to professional ethics, maintain confidentiality, avoid bias, and provide fair, evidence-based assessments. They may be bound by codes of conduct or guidelines from professional associations or publishing bodies.

In Poland, recenzenci play a central role in academic publishing, doctoral examinations, and research assessment activities. The system relies on the expertise and integrity of independent reviewers to uphold quality and advance knowledge.