Objectordissenting

Objectordissenting is a term used to describe a formal practice in deliberative bodies in which a participant both objects to a proposal during discussion and later records a dissent against the final outcome. The term combines the notions of an immediate objection with a formal expression of disagreement.

Though not a standardized term in any single jurisdiction, it is used in some governance studies to describe a mode of participation that seeks to preserve a minority's critical stance from debate through to decision. It can apply in corporate boards, legislative or municipal bodies, university senates, and nonprofit boards.

In practice, an objectordissenting action may involve raising a substantive objection during the meeting, followed by submitting a written dissent or minority report that accompanies the official record of the decision. The dissent may be attached to minutes, filed with the secretary, or circulated to stakeholders, depending on rules of procedure. In some organizations, such a filing can trigger additional review, reconsideration, or a formal appeal pathway.

Benefits include preserving dissenting viewpoints, improving transparency, and contributing to future policy refinement. Critics argue it can complicate decision-making, prolong meetings, and be exploited to delay outcomes without altering policy.

As a concept, objectordissenting is most often discussed in theoretical or reform contexts and is not universally recognized as a routine practice. It is described in relation to minority rights, procedural openness, and governance design. Related concepts include dissenting opinions, minority reports, and formal objections.