Ligalig

Ligalig is a term used in Indonesian political discourse to describe social and political upheaval framed as deliberate disruption intended to undermine public order or government authority. It is not a formal legal concept; rather, it functions as a label applied by actors in politics and media to categorize a range of activities—from protests and demonstrations to organized campaigns—perceived as destabilizing.

The origins and precise meaning of ligalig are uncertain, and it is generally treated as a contemporary rhetorical device rather than a fixed term. Its usage varies by outlet and political context, with different groups applying it in differing ways. Because of this variability, ligalig can carry different connotations depending on who uses it and for what purpose.

In practice, officials may invoke ligalig to justify security measures, surveillance, or restrictions on assembly, while supporters argue that the term highlights genuine threats to stability. Media usage ranges from cautious reporting to alarmist framing. The label often accompanies calls for policy responses, including heightened enforcement or legislative action.

Critics contend that ligalig can be misused to delegitimize peaceful dissent, expand executive powers, or suppress political opposition, and that it risks conflating protest with violence without evidence. Scholars and commentators emphasize the importance of distinguishing legitimate civic activity from actual violence or crime, and warn against using the term to erode civil liberties or to justify crackdown without due process.

Related topics include political rhetoric, social movements, civil liberties, and state security.