Home

COSOERM

COSOERM is a proposed framework that seeks to unify the COSO internal control model with enterprise risk management (ERM) practices into a single, coherent standard for governance, risk, and compliance. It aims to align internal control objectives with strategic risk management, enabling organizations to manage risk in pursuit of objectives while ensuring reliable reporting and accountability.

Origins and purpose: COSOERM emerged from professional discussions in the 2020s about harmonizing internal control and

Structure and components: The framework is described as comprising interrelated components that link strategy, risk, and

Implementation and use: Organizations considering COSOERM typically begin by mapping existing control and risk processes to

Reception and considerations: COSOERM is discussed as a useful concept for achieving greater coherence between internal

ERM
to
support
better
decision-making
and
governance.
It
is
not
an
official
COSO
publication,
but
it
draws
on
COSO’s
published
concepts
and
ERM
literature
to
offer
an
integrated
approach
that
can
be
adopted
by
diverse
organizations,
including
private
companies,
public
institutions,
and
nonprofits.
control
activities.
Core
areas
typically
highlighted
include
governance
and
culture;
strategy
and
objective-setting;
risk
identification
and
assessment;
risk
response
and
treatment;
control
activities
and
information,
communication
and
reporting;
and
monitoring
and
assurance.
The
model
emphasizes
alignment
with
risk
appetite,
ongoing
monitoring,
and
iterative
improvement
to
adapt
to
changing
objectives
and
external
conditions.
the
framework,
conducting
a
gap
analysis,
and
designing
an
integrated
program
that
covers
governance,
accountability,
and
documentation.
Practical
guidance
focuses
on
defining
roles,
establishing
governance
structures,
and
embedding
the
ERM
lifecycle
into
planning,
execution,
and
reporting
cycles.
control
and
risk
management.
Critics
note
potential
complexity
and
overlap
with
existing
COSO
and
ERM
resources,
while
supporters
view
it
as
a
clarifying,
adaptable
approach
to
integrated
governance.