sustainabilityand

Sustainabilityand is not a standard term in scholarly or professional discourse. It is more accurately described as a nonce coinage or textual artifact that arises when the word sustainability is joined by the conjunction and to introduce another topic. In formal writing, writers typically phrase the connection more explicitly, for example “sustainability and energy” or “sustainability and urban planning.”

In practice, the idea suggested by “sustainability and” is the recognition that sustainable development requires integrating environmental, social, and economic objectives across sectors. It frames discussions of how sustainability goals intersect with energy systems, agriculture, manufacturing, governance, finance, and technology. The approach is interdisciplinary and emphasizes identifying synergies and managing trade-offs.

The conceptual value of this framing lies in encouraging holistic thinking, aligning with frameworks such as the triple bottom line, circular economy, and lifecycle assessment. It is commonly used in policy documents and corporate strategy to signal coordinated action rather than isolated efforts.

Criticism focuses on ambiguity and vagueness: without a specified second concept, “sustainability and” can be imprecise. Editors and writers often replace it with precise pairings, such as “sustainability and energy efficiency” or “sustainability and social equity.” See also: sustainability; sustainable development; integrated reporting; systems thinking.