shotforshot

Shot-for-shot, also written as shotforshot, is a term used in film criticism to describe a remake that reproduces the original film’s shots with the same or nearly identical camera angles, shot lengths, blocking, and editing rhythms. In a shot-for-shot remake, the visual design and sequence of scenes are preserved as closely as possible, with changes typically limited to dialogue, performance, or minor technical updates.

The concept is most often discussed in relation to remakes of classic films. Notable examples frequently cited as shot-for-shot or nearly faithful include Gus Van Sant’s 1998 version of Psycho and Michael Haneke’s 2007 remake of Funny Games. In these cases, critics debate whether fidelity to the original enhances or diminishes the work’s impact, and whether such fidelity serves artistic or analytical purposes.

Origins and usage: The term arises in film criticism to describe a deliberate attempt to replicate a predecessor’s formal properties. While some directors use shot-for-shot strategies as experimental constraints or commentary on originality, others pursue the approach believing that fidelity itself can reveal new interpretive angles within a familiar story.

Reception and considerations: Shot-for-shot remakes are controversial. Proponents argue they can expose the original’s design and themes in a new context; detractors claim they may be dull, derivative, or exploitative. Legal and practical aspects, such as licensing and rights clearance, also influence whether a faithful remake is undertaken.

See also: Remake, Adaptation, Fidelity, Homage.