kustannushyötylaskennassa

Kustannushyötylaskenta, often abbreviated as KHT, is a systematic process used to evaluate the desirability of a project or decision by comparing its expected costs against its expected benefits. The core principle of KHT is to quantify, as much as possible, both the positive and negative financial implications of a proposed action. This allows for a more objective comparison between different options or a decision on whether to proceed with a single proposal.

The process typically involves identifying all relevant costs, which can include direct expenses, indirect costs, and opportunity costs. Similarly, all anticipated benefits are identified and quantified. These benefits can manifest as increased revenue, cost savings, improved efficiency, or other positive financial outcomes. Once identified, both costs and benefits are often expressed in monetary terms. This monetary valuation is crucial for direct comparison.

When the total quantified benefits exceed the total quantified costs, the project or decision is generally considered financially sound and worth pursuing. Conversely, if costs outweigh benefits, it suggests that the endeavor may not be economically viable. Kustannushyötylaskenta is a widely used tool in business, public policy, and project management to inform decision-making and allocate resources effectively. It helps to ensure that investments are made where they are likely to yield the greatest return.