jagrée

Jagrée is a framework for collaborative decision-making designed to structure deliberation and consensus in communities and online groups. It combines structured dialogue, criteria-based evaluation, and a transparent voting process to arrive at decisions with broad support. The term jagrée has no single, universally accepted origin and is used in various contexts to denote a formalized approach to group judgment and implementation.

The typical jagrée process unfolds in several phases. In the propose phase, participants submit proposals with stated goals and measurable indicators. Deliberation occurs through moderated rounds where participants critique proposals against predefined criteria such as feasibility, impact, equity, and risk. In the formalize phase, a decision is reached using a weighted scoring or multi-criterion voting method, and an implementation plan is drafted with responsibilities and timelines. A final review phase assesses outcomes against the stated metrics, enabling revisions if necessary.

Applications of jagrée are found in neighborhood associations, cooperative enterprises, and online communities seeking greater inclusivity and accountability. Advocates contend that jagrée encourages broad participation, increases transparency, and yields decisions that are more durable and legible to stakeholders. Critics warn that successful jagrée depends on skilled facilitation, clear criteria, and a culture of trust; without these, deliberations can stall or be dominated by certain groups or viewpoints.

Relation to related concepts: jagrée aligns with participatory budgeting, deliberative democracy, and consensus decision-making, while offering a concrete procedural template that emphasizes structured evaluation, accountability, and reversible decisions. Practical implementations vary, with practitioners adapting the framework to local norms, legal constraints, and available technological tools.