eristicism

Eristicism is a method of argumentation that aims to win a debate regardless of the validity of one's own position or the truth of the opposing argument. It is often characterized by the use of fallacious reasoning, sophistry, and rhetorical tricks to persuade an audience or opponent. The term originates from the Greek word eris, meaning "strife" or "quarrel," highlighting the combative and contentious nature of this approach.

Unlike dialectic, which seeks to uncover truth through reasoned discussion, eristicism prioritizes victory over truth. Proponents of eristicism may employ tactics such as equivocation, distraction, ad hominem attacks, and straw man arguments to undermine their opponent's case. The focus is on appearing to be right, rather than actually being right.

While sometimes associated with ancient Greek sophists, eristicism is not exclusive to that historical period. It can manifest in various forms of debate and discussion, from philosophical arguments to everyday disagreements. In modern contexts, eristic tendencies can be observed in political discourse, online arguments, and public debates where the goal is often to score points rather than to achieve mutual understanding or resolution. It is generally viewed as a counterproductive and intellectually dishonest way to engage in discussion.