antiimmigration

Anti-immigration refers to political positions and public policy proposals that oppose or seek to restrict immigration into a country. Proponents argue that controls protect jobs, public finances, and social cohesion, while preserving national sovereignty and security. Critics warn that restrictive approaches can undermine humanitarian obligations and may limit the economic and cultural benefits associated with migration. The term covers a range of views from cautious reform to exclusionary nationalism.

Policies associated with anti-immigration commonly include tighter border controls, higher visa and asylum thresholds, shorter processing times for rejection, stricter enforcement and penalties for irregular entry, and, in some cases, temporary moratoriums on new arrivals or on family reunification. Debates often link these policies to broader nationalist or populist agendas, though mainstream parties have also supported restrictive measures at times.

Research on the economic impact of immigration is mixed. Some studies suggest modest or context-dependent effects on wages and employment, particularly for low-skilled workers, while others emphasize long-run benefits from labor growth, entrepreneurship, and demographic balance. Public opinion frequently emphasizes cultural and social considerations, including assimilation and the perceived strain on public services.

Historically, many countries have adopted restrictive immigration policies in different eras. In the 20th century United States, national-origin quotas and strict border controls shaped migration flows; in Europe, debates intensified after mass movements and asylum pressures in the 1990s and 2010s. Regional variation reflects policy goals, institutions, and demographics, making anti-immigration discourse highly context-specific.