agreementsthat

Agreementsthat is not a widely recognized legal term, but in the context of contract drafting it can refer to clauses within an agreement that begin with the conjunction that to specify obligations, conditions, or representations. This article treats agreementsthat as a drafting pattern rather than a formal category, focusing on how such that-clauses operate to bind parties and define terms.

In contract text, that-clauses often serve to describe enforceable duties, conditions, or statements. Examples include: “The seller agrees that delivery shall occur by [date],” or “The buyer’s obligation is conditioned that the goods pass inspection.” They can also express representations or acknowledgments: “The parties acknowledge that….” The choice of that versus which and how much to bundle into a single sentence can affect precision. Plain-language drafting aims to minimize overly long or nested that-clauses and to define key terms consistently, with clear cross-references to schedules or exhibits where necessary.

Drafting considerations include keeping such clauses concise, using active voice, and defining important terms at the outset. Consider whether to separate multiple obligations into individual clauses rather than stacking them in one long that-clause. Maintain consistency with governing-law provisions and with other parts of the contract. When in doubt, prefer straightforward language and clear references to defined terms to reduce ambiguity.

Examples: “The licensor grants a license to use the Software, that permits the Licensee to reproduce copies for internal business purposes.” “The parties agree that any dispute shall be resolved by binding arbitration.” These illustrations are for general understanding and do not constitute legal advice. See also contract law, legal drafting, and plain-language guidelines.