Valitult

Valitult is a neologism used in discussions of epistemology and information quality to refer to a quality of information that satisfies two simultaneous criteria: logical validity of the reasoning and robust evidential support. The term blends notions of logical soundness with empirical or corroborated backing, and it is typically applied to claims, arguments, or datasets rather than to individuals.

Definition and scope

A valitult claim is one whose reasoning follows a valid argument form and for which the premises are supported by credible, verifiable evidence. Valitult is thus distinct from mere plausibility or truth by consensus; it emphasizes the structural integrity of the argument and the strength of the supporting data.

Characteristics

- Logical structure: the conclusion follows from the premises under accepted definitions and rules of inference.

- Evidentiary support: independent, reproducible, and credible evidence is available to back the premises.

- Robustness: the claim remains credible under reasonable alternative interpretations of the data and definitions.

Limitations

Valitult does not guarantee truth in an absolute sense, since premises or interpretations can shift. What counts as strong evidence may vary between disciplines, and disputes over methodology can affect whether a claim is considered valitult.

Origins and usage

The term has appeared in online debates, philosophy of science discussions, and some information-literacy contexts as a way to articulate a dual standard for evaluating claims. It remains a relatively niche term and is not universally adopted in formal scholarship.

See also

Validity, soundness, evidentialism, methodological rigor, information literacy, source credibility.