Tegenrapportages

Tegenrapportages are reports produced to counter, challenge, or supplement an existing report. They are typically written by parties affected by the original findings and aim to present an alternative interpretation, point out errors or gaps, provide additional data, or propose different conclusions.

They are used in a variety of contexts, including legal proceedings, administrative decision-making, investigations, audits, and regulatory inquiries. In journalism, academia, procurement, and environmental assessments, tegenrapportages can function as a formal instrument to ensure due process and to present a balanced view of contested information.

A typical tegenrapportage includes a summary of the original findings, a critique of the methodology and assumptions, a presentation of new evidence or data, a re-analysis of results, and a set of conclusions or recommendations. Clarity about sources, data quality, and limitations is important. Authors are usually identified and, when possible, established as qualified or independent to bolster credibility.

The credibility of a tegenrapportage rests on transparency, verifiable data, and methodological rigor. It should be grounded in objective criteria and subject to appropriate scrutiny or peer review where feasible. While it can help ensure a thorough examination of an issue, it also risks bias if used without proper evidence or clear standards.

In relation to the main report, a tegenrapportage does not replace the original document but serves as a supplementary, opposing, or complementary view to inform decision-makers, evaluators, or stakeholders.