Prosescientific

Prosescientific is an adjective used to describe approaches, methods, or reasoning that emphasize process-oriented rigor within scientific work. The term appears as a neologism in some online discussions and niche publications; it is a portmanteau of "process" and "scientific" and is sometimes pronounced with emphasis on the second syllable.

In practice, prosescientific thinking promotes explicit documentation of methods, standardized protocols, preregistration of study designs, and thorough reporting of data handling and analysis steps. It aligns with broader movements toward reproducibility and transparency.

Applications include research design, laboratory workflow, computational analyses, and science communication. Advocates argue that prosescientific practices help reduce bias, enable replication, and facilitate evaluation by peers and the public.

Because it is not widely established as a formal discipline, some scholars view prosescientific as overlapping with existing concepts such as the scientific method, methodological rigor, procedural ethics, and open science. Critics warn that the term may be vague or redundant and caution against jargon inflation.

Related concepts include open science, reproducibility, the scientific method, and research methodology. While not universally recognized as a standalone field, prosescientific serves as a descriptive label for a set of practices that prioritize clear procedures, transparent reporting, and systematic validation in scientific work.